Caveat emptor!
David, for those of us who are not professional philosophers, please define, describe, and/or enumerate the criteria for genuine or credible philosophy, as you did for genuine science vs pseudoscience.
Thank you.
I was expecting a few examples of this phenomena.
Hello there David, I hope you’re having a good week.
I’ve been seeing your notes for a while now, you have a unique perspective, thank you for sharing.
I thought you may enjoy the approach I take to history, grounded in historic literature:
https://substack.com/@jordannuttall/note/p-182017962?r=4f55i2&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
David, for those of us who are not professional philosophers, please define, describe, and/or enumerate the criteria for genuine or credible philosophy, as you did for genuine science vs pseudoscience.
Thank you.
I was expecting a few examples of this phenomena.
Hello there David, I hope you’re having a good week.
I’ve been seeing your notes for a while now, you have a unique perspective, thank you for sharing.
I thought you may enjoy the approach I take to history, grounded in historic literature:
https://substack.com/@jordannuttall/note/p-182017962?r=4f55i2&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action